Not long after North Carolina legislators instituted a cap on non-economic damages (e.g., pain and suffering) in medical malpractice cases in October 2011, the Missouri Supreme Court issued a completely opposite ruling on the same issue in August 2012. The Missouri court overturned a cap on non-economic damages that had stood for 25 years in that state, saying that the rule violated the Constitutional right to trial by jury.
The two actions illustrate the ongoing battle over caps on personal injury damages that has been raging in states throughout the country for years, and will probably continue to do so until a definitive case makes it to the United States Supreme Court. In the meantime, the controversy will continue.
Medical professionals, health care companies, and insurance companies argue in favor of the caps, claiming that limits on such damages:
Patient advocates, on the other hand, assert that the caps:
One area that is less affected by the caps is medical malpractice claims resulting from birth injuries. That is because, while most medical malpractice claims involve reimbursement of medical expenses incurred due to treatment of injuries, in the case of birth injuries the monetary damages awarded generally include large amounts earmarked for future medical needs of the injured child.
“She was very professional, kept me completely involved and updated with everything. Awesome job done.”
“Maria stayed on top of everything with updates, etc.”
“Very good communication throughout my case. Brenda paid great attention to my case and kept me up to date.”
“Both attorneys involved were very informative and walked me through my case every setp of the way. They answered any questions and concerns I had whenever they cam up. I was very nervous and skeptical at the beginning but that quickly changed.”
Please fill out form below and one of our attorneys will contact you.
Use the map below to find the location closest to you